We continue our “In the Spotlight” series with Boston-based filmmaker, Dennis Stevens, of Catzilla Productions, who was kind enough to sit down with us to discuss his latest project, a new web series called, “Last Day in Paradise.”
TSI: How did you first get into film and what first propelled you toward that decision?
DS: As a kid, I loved science fiction and horror films. When I was old enough, I was curious how they made those spaceships fly and how they turned Lon Chaney into a Wolfman. I used to read all the ‘fanzines’, as we called them, like Starlog and Fangoria. These magazines were started by fans, but they really looked at those genres from many perspectives. They would have interviews with special effects people, but also with writers, directors and actors. Those got me less interested in the mechanics of special effects, and more into plot, character development and other elements of storytelling. I started to see film as a way of telling a story, and storytelling as ways of exploring the world. In my early teens my Mom got me an 8mm camera, and my friends and I made some little sci-fi and horror films. How good were these films? Well, they looked like they were made by 12 year old boys in suburban Michigan in 1979, which they were.
By the time I was in college, my interests had shifted, and I wasn’t actually making films any more. I watched a lot of movies, read film theory and criticism, etc. I majored in Religion, and minored in Anthropology, concentrating on Eastern Traditions like Hinduism, Buddhism, etc. I traveled a bit as well. I sort of felt I should see the real world before creating imaginary worlds. But I always wanted to work in the film world. Then about 5 years ago, I read about how digital video was changing filmmaking. Just for fun I bought a $300 video camera. I wrote a script, and just got some friends to act in it and help out. It was a bit like being 12 years old again.
I’ve always been imaginative, but I was never good at drawing, or writing or anything that let me express myself. When I started editing the first scene, I saw the little bits of computer files coming together and telling my story. The little vision in my head was real, and I could show other people. It was a like a revelation. It was like someone who picks up the guitar the first time, and they suddenly realize this is their instrument. Film is my instrument, my paint brush.
TSI: Were you afraid, trying something so different? How did/do you combat that fear?
DS: Well, the fear I think comes from the fear of failure. If you never try, then you never fail. You also never succeed. A great inoculation against the fear of failure is to go ahead and fail. So you tried something and it didn’t work. So what? Try again. You’ll do better.
I knew I needed to make films because I enjoy the process of making films. If you just like the idea of being a filmmaker, it will be difficult to succeed because it’s a lot of work. It’s like if you just want to call yourself a writer, it’ll be hard to have the discipline to actually sit and write for hours at a time. I like the casting, planning scenes, being on set, doing the post production, etc.
The other issue to mention is looking at film as a career. I’ve changed careers before, and I know it’s a process of years, not something you just do. There is no road map either, so you may try things and have them not work. Film/TV also has it’s own culture, like software programming, or sales, or finance. You have to be sort of an anthropologist yourself, and figure out the rules, written and unwritten, that govern this strange world you’ve entered.
TSI: Who have been some of your real sources of knowledge, inspiration, etc.?
DS: I’m a fan of films of the 70s, particularly American films. This is the era of Scorsese, William Friedkin, Coppolla, and films like The French Connection, Harold and Maude, Midnight Cowboy. Films that challenged and questioned. There are a lot of foreign directors I look to like Luis Bunuel and Pedro Almodovar.
TSI: Are there certain themes that repeat in your work? If so, why do you
think that is?
DS: A theme I find in my own work is how people make decisions, and those decisions lead in a different direction from where they wanted to go. This is probably from my own experience. I recently reconnected with a friend from high school, who I haven’t heard from in 20 years. He went to film school after graduating from high school. I originally planned to get a PhD and be an academic. Guess what? He has a PhD and teaches English literature. I’m the one who actually makes films.
TSI: What has been a highlight of your time working in film so far?
DS: That’s hard to say, because even when it’s a pain in the ass, which it often is, I still love it. I can only say it is the people I’ve met. I keep meeting people with energy and talent. Just being around them inspires me.
TSI: What is a filmmaking lesson you’ve learned that you wish you hadn’t had to?
DS: HA! You mean, ‘what’s the dumbest, most obvious mistake you’ve ever made?’ They are all obvious in hindsight.
Actually, I can think of one film in particular. I shot about 80% of the film, and I knew the scenes weren’t working. I kept thinking I’ll be able to edit something together, we’re just having some bad days, etc. I eventually re-cast practically everyone and got a new crew. The ‘new’ film came out really well. But I would have saved myself a lot of time, money and angst if I had just shut down after the first day and re-evaluated.
TSI: What is some of the best advice you’ve gotten regarding filmmaking?
DS: The best advice is something I’ve heard several times. Only do it if you love the process of making films. If it just sounds cool, you may be in for a rude awakening when you stand around for 5 hours. Or work yourself to the bone for 7 hours straight.
You have to be a bit of a risk taker. Nothing is ever perfect. In ‘Making Movies’, Sidney Lumet said he’s released at least one film a year for 50 years because you only learn to direct by directing. You can plan all you want, but you only really learn by getting out there, and dealing with problems as they arise. Each film takes on a life of its own. A film is the alchemy of all the elements – light, sound, acting, writing. The film starts to tell you what it is and where it wants to go. You just have to listen.
Being creative means you expose yourself to the criticism of others. It’s the toughest part, because art is always personal. It’s quite a trick, because you have to be in touch with your feelings but protect yourself emotionally. I always remind myself they are reacting to the film, not me. Again, the only way to progress is to go ahead and risk failure. If you don’t want to hear other people’s reactions, make the films with sock puppets and don’t show them to anyone.
TSI: What are you working on now?
DS: My big project is a web series called ‘Last Day In Paradise.’ It’s about a guy who inherits a cult. Basically, the main character inherits some property from his estranged father. He discovers his father was running a cult on the property – and the cultists want him to be their new guru. You might guess that my academic background studying Eastern Religions is a big part of this.
The other inspiration is a fun exercise I sometimes do. I ask someone, ‘Do you believe in God?’. ‘Yes,’ they usually say. ‘OK, please tell me who or what God is?’ I usually get stunned silence, or a stammering, hesitant reply. It’s interesting that they immediately said they believed in God, and had never, ever considered what that meant.
The web series is my attempt to look at that. The whole premise is about someone who is not religious having to deal with people are intensely religious. I’m always interested in stories where people’s assumptions get challenged, and in this situation, all the characters are forced to question beliefs they passionately hold.
I’m really excited about the cast of “Last Day In Paradise,” and I’d like to talk about them.
Ciaran Crawford plays the male lead, and is a native of Donegal, Ireland. Besides his theater credits, he was on an episode of ‘The Sopranos’. Ciaran brings his easygoing accessibility and likeability to the role. That’s really critical to this role, as the character represents the ‘regular person’ as he encounters the cult.
Casey McDougal has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Connecticut, and has a lot of commercial and indie film experience, as well as a lot of theater. She plays a young cult member named Aimee. The key to this character is she has a very long arc, and during the series will go to a very different place from where she starts. Casey showed a lot of range and versatility in the audition which we did over a Skype connection.
Ruth Sullivan plays Samantha Harrison, the lawyer who represents the cult and contacts Scott. I saw Ruth in some wonderful indie films that were shot in Rhode Island, so when she answered the casting call, she was one of the first people I auditioned. She has this great range and a real presence on the screen.
Ramona S Taj plays Mary, a cult member who is afraid of change. Actually, Ramona is different in age and appearance from the way I wrote Mary. But I read opposite her during her audition, and she really understood the character and was really excited about the project. It’s the kind of intuitive understanding of a character that you really look for.
Colin Allen plays Mark, a shy, bookish young man who is also a cult member. Colin also shined in the audition, and his reel showed a great range. Range, by the way, is really key here, because all the characters will go through some dramatic changes over the series.
I’m very actor-centric in my directing. If you don’t have a human presence on the screen for the audience to relate to, you’ve got nothing. This piece in particular is completely dependent on strong acting. If you don’t find these characters interesting, the show is going nowhere. So I’m over the moon to have this cast, because they are clearly the right people.
TSI: Any other things on the burners?
DS: I’ve always got a bunch of things going on. I just finished Kalliope’s Karavan, which is a documentary about a group of sideshow and vaudeville performers in Boston. Besides live performances, I have interviews with burlesque dancers, mentalists and a female escape artist.
I have a couple things that are just germs of an idea. I have a sci-fi idea where we discover life on one of the icy moons of Jupiter. Apparently some of these moons might actually have life in oceans under a layer of ice. I read that and wondered how we would communicate with them. If they are under the ice, can they even see the sky? How would we tell them we’re actually from another planet?
I also have what I call a historical bromance. Tecumseh was a famous Shawnee Native American leader who led Indian resistance around the War of 1812. He briefly allied with a British officer, General Isaac Brock. In reality, they only knew each for a few days, but they captured large chunks of American territory while working together. It seems like these two men, from utterly different backgrounds, forged deep bonds of affection. They both had personal circumstances that sort of drew them together. That’s all I’ve got right now. To be historically accurate America would be the bad guys, and the two main characters get killed. So that might be a tough sell!
–
Dennis Stevens was born and raised in Michigan, and came to Boston in 1990 to attend Harvard Divinity School. He has been a filmmaker since 2005 and has had several films in local Boston film festivals.
For more information on Catzilla Productions and its various projects, please visit www.catzillaproductions.com.
For all press inquiries, please contact nicoleg@treadsoftlyink.com.
If you are a fine artist or filmmaker and would like to be considered for a print interview with Tread Softly Ink, please contact us at info@treadsoftlyink.com.










